ALTERNATIVE NEWS, MYSTERY'S, UFO'S,PARANORMAL
Visitors please register your name and e-mail.

Registered member benefits include:

Full access to all category's including specials.

Free live chat.

Highlighted new content.



As always registration is FREE!!
Check Out UTOPIA

Thu Jan 24, 2013 4:31 am by Admin



Utopia Forum is almost complete and is now ready for all new members and visitors.

The forum is a little different to here as it uses a single page forum which puts all the topics on one page with important threads globally pinned at the top of the page.

Like i said we are ALMOST complete but we are still playing around and moving things about so please bare …

Comments: 0

VISITOR PINPOINT
Earthquake Monitor

Secret Group Helping Obama Destroy The Constitution - Exclusive

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Secret Group Helping Obama Destroy The Constitution - Exclusive

Post  Admin on Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:26 pm

On March 2, 2012 I gave a legal analysis of HR347/S1794 (which included some links to frightening government abuses) and how it unquestionably violates the First Amendment. Upon hearing numerous reports the following week, I realized that the people are not getting the whole truth.

For those who have not read my blog, please do so, but here is a brief summary. HR 347 and S 1794, the ‘‘Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011” has nothing to do with improvinglandscapingaround federal buildings. This bill is being presented as a No Trespassing bill. Reasonable people understand that restrictions and protections are needed for government officials and government functions. However, this legislation makes it a federal crime to simply DISRUPT the ORDERLY CONDUCT of government. The violator doesn’t have to be on the grounds where the governmentbusinessis being conducted, just within the vicinity of the so-called business. The law is not limited to buildings or locations as the title suggests, but seems to be “roving” and follows persons protected by Secret Service wherever they go.The language could be interpreted to refer to an official who is eligible for Secret Service protection and not protected by them at the moment of the alleged violation.How long before we hear the argument that federal officials are “protected” by secret service even if secret service is not present at the time? The bottom line is: Your First Amendment right to peaceably assemble - is now a federal crime.

In one particular report on this bill, Fox News focuses the blame almost entirely on the President.The report even leads off with the headline, “Suppressing Free Speech? President Signs Anti-protest Bill.”The report includes an interview with Judge Napolitano where he gives a brief review of the potential impact of this bill.The entire focus is again on Obama’s signing of this bill and what he will do with it.The fact is that there is a group of individuals that played a much more significant role in this and it is becoming one of the greatest cover-ups going on today.I will now do what no one else seems to have the guts to do.I will tell you their names.Are you ready?

A quick look at the roll call for this bill will show you that only 3 Republicans in the House voted against this Constitutional atrocity: Ron Paul (R-Tx), Paul Broun (R-Ga), and Justin Amish (R-Mi).That means that every other “conservative” House member that thought it important enough to show up and vote, voted for this bill and against the Constitution.Who was your “Tea Party” favorite in 2010? Who did you elect on the promise to uphold the Constitution and Constitutional Principles?Was it perhaps Allen West, Michele Bachmann, Jeff Landry, or Joe Walsh?“I am a patriot,” they say.Yet, how did they vote when the Constitution was on the line?

What about the Senate?You don’t have to work hard to decipher the roll call for S1794 because the vote in favor of putting government over the Constitution was UNANIMOUS! Again, who was your “Tea Party” favorite in Senate?Perhaps Jim Demint, Jerry Moran, Mike Lee, Ron Johnson or, dare I say it, Marco Rubio?

How will they answer when you question them on this?Will you hear, “security over liberty” arguments?Will they tell you that the threat against our representatives deserves greater consideration than our Constitutionally protected rights?

One vote is no big deal right?Maybe, but some votes are not inconsequential when they destroy the very safeguards of Liberty. But it is not one vote; there is a pattern forming here.

continue at KrisAnneHall.com:

krisannehall.com/index.php/blog/
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 617
Join date : 2010-10-23

View user profile http://chatter.betaboard.net

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum